Compare the2025 Ford Mustang Mach-EVS 2025 Genesis Electrified GV70

With its standard Pre-Collision Assist with Automatic Emergency Braking, the Ford Mustang Mach-E is better at preventing collisions with pedestrians than the Genesis Electrified GV70, according to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety:

The Mustang Mach-E has standard Post Collision Braking, which automatically apply the brakes in the event of a crash to help prevent secondary collisions and prevent further injuries. The Electrified GV70 doesn’t offer a post collision braking system: in the event of a collision that triggers the airbags, more collisions are possible without the protection of airbags that may have already deployed.

Both the Mustang Mach-E and the Electrified GV70 have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, driver knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, height adjustable front shoulder belts, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, blind spot warning systems, around view monitors, rear cross-path warning and driver alert monitors.

There are over 13 times as many Ford dealers as there are Genesis dealers, which makes it much easier should you ever need service under the Mustang Mach-E’s warranty.

J.D. Power and Associates’ 2024 Initial Quality Study of new car owners surveyed provide the statistics that show that Ford vehicles are better in initial quality than Genesis vehicles. J.D. Power ranks Ford above average in initial quality. With 5 more problems per 100 vehicles, Genesis is rated lower.

From surveys of all its subscribers, Consumer Reports’ March 2025 Auto Issue reports that Ford vehicles are more reliable than Genesis vehicles. Consumer Reports ranks Ford 1 place higher in reliability than Genesis.

The Mustang Mach-E GT Performance/Rally’s standard electric motors produces 51 more horsepower (480 vs. 429) and 184 lbs.-ft. more torque (700 vs. 516) than the Electrified GV70’s electric motors.

As tested in Motor Trend the Ford Mustang Mach-E is faster than the Genesis Electrified GV70:

On the EPA test cycle the Mustang Mach-E gets better mileage than the Electrified GV70:

The Mustang Mach-E can travel longer on a full charge than the Electrified GV70 on a full charge:

For better stopping power the Mustang Mach-E GT/Rally’s front brake rotors are larger than those on the Electrified GV70:

The Mustang Mach-E stops much shorter than the Electrified GV70:

The Mustang Mach-E has vehicle speed sensitive variable-assist power steering, for low-effort parking, better control at highway speeds and during hard cornering, and a better feel of the road. The Electrified GV70 doesn’t offer variable-assist power steering.

For a smoother ride and more stable handling, the Mustang Mach-E’s wheelbase is 4.3 inches longer than on the Electrified GV70 (117.5 inches vs. 113.2 inches).

The Mustang Mach-E GT handles at .92 G’s, while the Electrified GV70 Prestige pulls only .85 G’s of cornering force in a Car and Driver skidpad test.

The Mustang Mach-E GT executes Motor Trend’s “Figure Eight” maneuver quicker than the Electrified GV70 Prestige (25.9 seconds @ .7 average G’s vs. 26.3 seconds @ .74 average G’s).

The Ford Mustang Mach-E may be more efficient, handle and accelerate better because it weighs up to about 600 pounds less than the Genesis Electrified GV70.

The front grille of the Mustang Mach-E uses electronically controlled shutters to close off airflow and reduce drag when less engine cooling is needed. This helps improve highway fuel economy. The Electrified GV70 doesn’t offer active grille shutters.

The Mustang Mach-E has .3 inches more front headroom, 2 inches more front legroom and 1.5 inches more rear legroom than the Electrified GV70.

The Mustang Mach-E has a larger cargo volume with its rear seat up than the Electrified GV70 with its rear seat up (29.7 vs. 28.7 cubic feet). The Mustang Mach-E has a larger cargo volume with its rear seat folded than the Electrified GV70 with its rear seat folded (59.7 vs. 56.5 cubic feet).

If the windows are left open on the Mustang Mach-E the driver can close them all from a distance using the remote. On a hot day the driver can also lower the windows the same way. The driver of the Electrified GV70 can only close the windows from inside the vehicle, with the ignition on.

In case you lock your keys in your vehicle, or don’t have them with you, you can let yourself in using the Mustang Mach-E’s exterior PIN entry system. The Electrified GV70 doesn’t offer an exterior PIN entry system, and its Connected Care can’t unlock the doors if the vehicle doesn’t have cell phone reception or the driver can’t contact the service.

Consumer Reports rated the Mustang Mach-E’s headlight performance “Very Good,” a higher rating than the Electrified GV70’s headlights, which were rated “Good.”

The Mustang Mach-E is available in both rear-wheel drive and four-wheel drive configurations. The Electrified GV70 doesn’t offer a two-wheel drive configuration.

Consumer Reports® recommends the Ford Mustang Mach-E, based on reliability, safety and performance. The Genesis Electrified GV70 isn't recommended.

A group of representative automotive journalists from North America selected the Mustang Mach-E as the 2021 North American Utility Vehicle of the Year. The Electrified GV70 has never been chosen.

The Ford Mustang Mach-E outsold the Genesis GV70 by 70% during 2024.